Reader Question: What Should He/She Do?
Posted by: Lisa in Writing/Editing Tips: Nuts and BoltsI’m back! Boy, have I been busy since my last post: adopting a child from Guatemala, ghostwriting a novel for a famous author who must remain unnamed, training for the Boston Marathon… Oh, fine. I’ve just been busy editing. (I knew no one would believe that last one.)
Back to business with an interesting question from Darlene:
How do you handle sentences that could apply to either gender when you’re writing for both? Do you use he or she (or him or her), or they (or their)?
For example: If you meet a stranger in a coffee shop, do you notice their (or his or her) smile?
There’s no one right answer, Darlene. But a little guidance and good sense will help you handle a tricky issue.
The Chicago Manual of Style, my most frequently consulted authority on such matters, dislikes the use of the plural possessive with a singular noun (in your example, “their smile”). Others, however, have come to view it as an acceptable alternative to the awkward but politically correct “his or her” or “his/her.” Even more acceptable is a sentence such as “When a person is thirsty, they take a drink,” because it doesn’t require juxtaposing the singular with the plural in the same way.
In cases where no hard-and-fast rule applies, and word usage is evolving as we speak (and write), we must make a judgment based on the context. I don’t know what you’re writing, but it seems this issue comes up more in nonfiction than in fiction—in fiction, a specific character is usually being discussed, while nonfiction is more likely to make generalizations about people. In nonfiction, it is less awkward to use “his or her” or “their,” because you don’t have to worry as much about distancing the reader from the story and characters.
I find “his or her,” and even worse, “he/she,” to be distracting and clunky in fiction. But I also cringe a little every time I see “they” or “their” in a singular construction (though its usage in speech has become so common that I cringe less when I see it in dialogue). Some writers alternate between the genders, but that can be just plain confusing. And the feminist in me, though she has chilled out since my college days, does wish there were some decent alternative to using “he” as the catch-all standard.
Problem is, the alternatives have the aforementioned problems of awkwardness, unwieldiness, and just plain grammatical incorrectness (which I consider a greater sin than political incorrectness). Whether you’re writing a piece in which this comes up frequently, or you just encountered it in one sentence and don’t know what to do, try first to recast the sentence to avoid the problem altogether.
Here’s an alternative for your example:
If you meet a stranger in a coffee shop, do you notice that stranger’s smile?
And another version of my own example:
A person’s thirst is usually quenched by a drink.
More interesting sentences, in the end, no? They won’t all be so easy to fix, but challenging yourself to reword sentences is a good way to get your writer’s mind to think outside the box, vary sentence structure more, and simply exercise its creative muscle.
If anyone has a particularly tricky example of this problem, leave it in the comments below and I’ll see what I can do to help!
Tags: pronouns, writing tips
Entries (RSS)
April 7th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
If I were Glorious Dictator Of All Things Grammatical, the correct usage would be to simply match the gender of the writer. I would use “he,” Lisa would use “she,” and nobody would be dumb enough to be offended by the idea of using a gender-specific word in a gender-neutral context. Such is language — get over it already.
On the other hand, randomly alternating genders offends me because it’s awkward and silly. (See The Writer’s Journey for an otherwise good book on writing that does this to painful effect.)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Interesting idea, O Glorious Dictator. I suggest, however, that if a writer were to decide to use one gender or the other consistently in a piece, the choice should depend not on the writer, but on the content. I, a woman, would hardly choose to use “she” if I were writing about, for example, the military, as I would likely be writing about many more men than women!
April 18th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
You’re adding another element to the equation.
April 18th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Yes, and you added another element as well: the writer’s identity.
April 21st, 2008 at 4:26 pm
The writer is inherent to the work — content that suggests an appropriate gender isn’t guaranteed. Consider my suggestion to be “all else being equal.”
So nanny nanny boo boo.
April 21st, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Content is more inherent to the work than the writer is, since the content IS the work. Your argument is predicated on the assumption that the writer’s gender always “suggests an appropriate gender” for the pronouns.
I disagree, for the simple reason that we can easily find ourselves reading something without knowing or noticing who the author is, but the content is pretty hard to avoid.
Nanny nanny boo boo to you, too.
May 3rd, 2008 at 7:33 am
If you meet a stranger in a coffee shop, do you notice their (or his or her) smile?
As a simple minded person, I notice their smile, unless I want to bring gender into the equation, then I would use her or his. I emphasize simple minded.
May 22nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Did you even read my post? I wrote “content that suggests an appropriate gender,” not “content.” The point was that the writer should just match his ( :p ) own gender UNLESS the content suggests otherwise.
You silly goose.
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Nanny nanny boo boo indeed
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:53 pm
Yes, Aaron, I read all posts carefully. Perhaps you didn’t make your point clearly enough.
Your original post said that if you were the ruler of the grammatical world, “the correct usage would be to simply match the gender of the writer.” Even if we qualify that to say “unless the content suggests an appropriate gender,” I would disagree. I have never seen anything written that way (i.e., because the writer is a “she,” female pronouns are used), and I see no reason why the gender of the writer should cause the content to be skewed “feminine” or “masculine.” A man isn’t necessarily writing about men, nor a woman about women.
Methinks we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. I think we’ve just proved the point that it’s a tough issue.
July 10th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
“Your argument is predicated on the assumption that the writer’s gender always “suggests an appropriate gender” for the pronouns.”
ahhh!!!! are you allowed to use the passive voice?
Your predicated argument assumes that the writer’s gender always “suggests an appropriate gender” for the pronouns.
don’t ever be passive when smacking aaron.
sorry, lisa, i just got bickering-envy.
fabulous, site by the way.
October 9th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
I will often solve this dilemma by simply making the subject plural.
For example, “If you meet a stranger in a coffee shop, do you notice their (or his or her) smile?” becomes “If you meet strangers in a coffee shop, do you notice their smiles?” This particular example doesn’t provide the most elegant demonstration of the technique, but try it with “When I meet a potential client for coffee, he or she is usually late.”