Writing Exercise I: The Winning Submission
Posted by: Lisa in Writing Contests & ExercisesThanks to all of you who submitted responses to my writing exercise. As a reminder, the instructions were to tell the following story in just three paragraphs:
A woman rushing to an appointment has a fender-bender, resulting in her meeting an intriguing man.
I received dozens of imaginative and intriguing efforts, but the following story emerged as my favorite. Nice writing, Lucy from Santa Barbara! Lucy will be receiving a free copy of Alice McDermott’s lovely new novel After This.
Let’s look at Lucy’s short story:
Perry hurried along the shoulder of Route 9 carrying her four-inch heels. Could she open her briefcase, remove her notes for the Ever-Brite Toothpaste presentation, and review them without missing a stride? Probably not. She’d been practicing the presentation in her car and knew it needed one final element. An image. A hook. A spokesperson.
But then that bastard in the Volvo had nicked her from behind and sped away, leaving Perry’s fender on the pavement and Perry footing it to the Ever-Brite offices. She brainstormed with herself: Teeth. White. Gleam! Nothing.
She’d left her fender behind with the rest of her car to wait two hours for the AAA tow truck. Perry couldn’t wait with it. She would walk the remaining mile, make her presentation without that missing element, and then take a taxi back to meet the tow truck. As she congratulated herself on her perseverance in the face of life’s harsh realities, a man in a suit pulled up alongside her and rolled down the window of his Lexus. “Can I help you?†he said, with a wide, black-toothed smile.
What do I like about this story? First, its economical word choice. Some of you wrote stories of only three sentences. Making every word count is the right idea, but being concise in your word choice doesn’t necessarily mean writing something as short as possible. A five-hundred-page novel can be less wordy than one badly written paragraph. The above story isn’t perfect, but it has a few key elements of good writing missing from almost every other submission:
- Use of strong nouns and verbs. This story uses nouns and verbs to describe the characters and situation, rather than strings of adjectives and adverbs. Did you even notice the lack of a physical description of Perry? I’ll guess “no,” because your imagination formulated its own image of her.
- Writing “outside the box.” In every other story, without exception, the “intriguing man” was either the driver of the other car or a police officer. Original, memorable writing and rewriting requires the ability to free your imagination from the constraints of cliche and predictability.
- Lack of extraneous information. Read the story again and see if you can remove any sentence without also removing information necessary to the story and its effect. While reading most of your stories, I found myself thinking at least once, “Why did I need to know this?”
Thanks again to every writer who participated! I’ll continue to post more contests, exercises, and opportunities for you to share your thoughts and experiences on writing. In the meantime, I’ll send each writer who took the time to do this exercise a brief critique. If you have any comments or additional feedback on Lucy’s story, please post a comment below!
Entries (RSS)
January 8th, 2007 at 11:16 am
Strephon’s critical analysis of the winning story:
Thanks, Lisa, for your analysis of my own story. Your remarks were truly helpful, and considering all the work you have done for all the many stories that came in, you have writing stamina!
I may be biased with Lucy’s story you picked as ‘best’ for you, but I also teach writing and sell to writers my The Writer’s Interface. So just to say, please see my comments as another editor’s different list of what to look for.
-this literary device fails for me: selling Ever-Bright tooth paste and meeting the man in the car with the black teeth at the end? Black teeth? Never met one! Image too strong and so it distracts me. Maybe a yellow patch on a tooth, followed by the last line spoken by her: ‘Excuse me, but is there something wrong with your teeth?’ I still don’t understand black teeth. I also had to read twice to connect the third and first paragraphs.
-the ’story-problem’ is not resolved, as it always should be in a satisfying short story. First paragraph has a ‘hook problem.’ The character is trying to find a hook for her presentation, but has not yet. Possible implied resolution: an advertising image of a handsome, well-equipped man with black teeth introducing himself to a pretty woman. Yes, it could work, but is it clear? And as I said, black teeth, rather than a yellow tooth among white teeth, is too strong because it takes one out of the story rather than further into it.
-Confusion in voice: this very serious. Starts third person: ‘Perry hurried along,’ instead of, ‘Perry felt herself practically running.’ For in the ending third paragraph we find this: ’she would walk the remaining mile.’ This is first person interior thought process. In the second paragraph we find: ‘that bastard in the volvo had nicked her,’ Definitely first person. For stronger impact stick to one point of view. It would be easy to change all the lines to her own self-descriptions of what she is going through, thus to create greater shock at the end for meeting the man with ’special teeth.’
-minor things: find the extra words as Lisa asks for: ‘been practicing.’ Better: ‘practiced.’ ‘An image,’ not needed because it does not add. Three of anything is always too many. Basic human psychology, as we know from sexual triangles. ‘AAA’ regional. ‘Tow truck’ enough to describe image and let the reader from anywhere in the world put in their own kind of tow truck. ‘Then’ superfluous in ‘and then take a taxi.’
-The story is really four paragraphs, so is ‘disqualified,’ but I’m not judging, am I? (smile) “Can I help you?” dialogue is always put in a separate paragraph for clarity and switching characters. Always make separate paragraphs when switching characters or points of view.
Literary fun! Thanks Lisa and Lucy for an interesting lunch!
-Strephon
January 8th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
Thanks for the great critique, Strephon! Valid points all. I agree that the story could be improved in the ways you mention. Faced with a lot of flawed attempts, I liked this story mainly for what it tried to do, which was more imaginative than most others.
Is AAA really regional? I always thought it was a nationwide service… I guess I’ve just always lived in places where you can call AAA!